Blind boys online dating vbulletin
Does it depend on the ethnicity of his mother, about whom we know literally nothing? Does modern Kurdish nationalism have anything to do with the Kurds of the 12th century? A mercifully brief edit war over whether Orpheus can be classified as Greek, Thracian, or Macedonian.He definitely spoke Arabic, but did he speak Kurdish too? He was born in Tikrit, so does that make him Iraqi? Montenegrin became the official language of Montenegro in 2007 and received a new standard on 10 July 2009, but it has been promoted by the Montenegrin community since 2004. And to what extent does "Thracian" mean "Bulgarian"?Occasionally, even experienced Wikipedians lose their heads and devote every waking moment to edit warring over the most trivial thing, wasting time debating topics of no practical value, or wrestling over questions whose answers hold no practical consequence. It isn't comprehensive or authoritative, but it serves as a showcase of situations where people lose sight of the big picture and obsessively expend huge amounts of energy fighting over something that, in the end, isn't really so important.Edit warring is believed by some to be important, possibly due to the historical regularity and frequency of the occurrence of these wars. In some earlier instances of edit warring, dating back from before the good old days, participants would simply utilize their swords and fight a battle, or later, their guns and fight a duel.A careful and scholarly study of available archeological evidence has even suggested that edit wars may have recurred on a regular basis going back all the way to the beginning of recorded history, even before the advent of proper writing circa 2001 C. In modern times, physical combat has been outlawed and replaced by the careful inciting of personal attacks, strategic 3RR templating and canvassing, timely notices on WP: AN/I, and (in some cases) marking the changes as a minor edit. It is not, has never been, nor will ever be, a Wikipedia policy or guideline.Truly, the revolutionary Wikipedia outlook has changed the way things get done. Rather, it illustrates standards or conduct that are generally not accepted by the Wikipedia community.
If you want to add a "lame edit war" to this page, keep the following in mind: Was Chopin Polish, French, Polish–French, or French–Polish?What event of October 1849 was he referring to, the crushing of the Hungarian rebellion or the death of Chopin? Is it bad faith to remove HTML comments from the page if only editors will see them, or do such invisible comments constitute a vandalism of their own? But was he a Kurd, Arab, Turk, Persian, Armenian, some combination of these, or something else?Or was it the publication of Heinrich Heine's rude poem about him? Is it a bad thing to use the "minor" button to "conceal" changes? Were his father and uncle Kurds, or Arabs, or Kurdicized Arabs, or Turks, or Kurdicized Turks? If he is ethnically Kurdish, is the Ayyubid dynasty that followed him a Kurdish dynasty?It has changed them from actually getting done to never getting done. Some discussions are born lame; some achieve lameness; some have lameness thrust upon them.